Sign up for our daily Newsletter and stay up to date with all the latest news!

Subscribe I am already a subscriber

You are using software which is blocking our advertisements (adblocker).

As we provide the news for free, we are relying on revenues from our banners. So please disable your adblocker and reload the page to continue using this site.
Thanks!

Click here for a guide on disabling your adblocker.

Sign up for our daily Newsletter and stay up to date with all the latest news!

Subscribe I am already a subscriber

US (CA): State allows growers to reduce license size

The California Department of Cannabis Control (DCC) just published some new guidelines for cannabis cultivators following the passage of SB-833. Among other things, California will let cannabis cultivators reduce their canopy size and thereby reduce license costs. This will be a huge benefit. I write a lot about the woes that California's cannabis industry faces – often due to overly burdensome regulation – but in this case, I think the DCC's guidelines will have a positive impact on certain cannabis cultivators in the Golden State.

California has about a zillion different types of licenses for cannabis cultivators. They are based on size (specialty cottage, specialty, small, medium, and the relatively new large) and type (indoor, outdoor, or mixed-light). And there are separate licenses for nurseries and processors (you might think processing is manufacturing, because that would make sense, but you'd be wrong!).

Having more than a dozen different types of licenses guaranteed problems. One of those problems is that the state did not create a mechanism to easily change between license size. With the opening of large licensing in 2023, the state made it possible to go "up" in size, but not down. This was a big problem for a lot of folks in the industry.

Here's an example: imagine a cultivator got a medium indoor license (which allowed for between 10,001 and 22,000 square feet of canopy). At the time of licensure the cultivator had enough built-out capacity to have 7,500 square feet of canopy, but expected to build out another room a few months down the line. For whatever reason, the cultivator didn't have the means to complete the buildout and was stuck paying the medium indoor fee of $77,905 as opposed to the small indoor fee of $35,410.

Read more at harris-sliwoski.com

Publication date: