Sign up for our daily Newsletter and stay up to date with all the latest news!

Subscribe I am already a subscriber

Sign up for our daily Newsletter and stay up to date with all the latest news!

Subscribe I am already a subscriber

Should I use HPS or LED for growing cannabis?

“What lighting source should I use for my licensed cannabis grow?”; “I am comparing LED to HPS for my cannabis operation. Which source do you recommend?” These are questions growers ask almost daily. Like many aspects of growing, deciding if you should grow under HPS (high-pressure sodium) or LED does not have a silver bullet answer! There are a lot of variables that need to be considered and then prioritized to your own individual operational needs, and it is an important step in understanding which type of lighting will fit this critical investment.

To figure out what type of horticultural lighting you should use, begin by rating the following six factors: Budget, Maintenance, Electrical costs, HVAC requirements, Growing requirements, and Spectrum, in order of your priorities.  We will overview all these factors and then review a Pros & Cons chart comparing double-ended (DE) HPS, LED, and a hybrid HPS-LED system at the end to see which lighting type meets your needs.  

The amount you have to invest, as well as your return on investment, should be key things to consider when buying a new lighting system. 

An all-LED system can be approximately 3 to 4 times the cost of an all-HPS DE system. Yet, LED fixtures may be eligible for locally available hydro incentives that could reduce approximately 10-25% of the LED system cost if DLC-listed.

Then, it is crucial to consider also the warranty. DE HPS fixtures have a 3-year warranty. HPS lamps have a 4-year warranty or up to 10,000 burning hours. On the other hand, LED fixtures have a 5-year warranty, or up to 50,000 hour lifetime (a requirement to be eligible for DLC listing)

Both HPS and LED luminaires need to be cleaned and maintained to keep them working efficiently and at their highest output.  HPS luminaires require more maintenance than LEDs since they also require re-lamping as well as reflector cleaning.

With regards to DE HPS re-lamping costs and associated labor, approximately every 1-4 years depending on your burning hours and ROI (return on investment); on top of that, reflector cleaning and associated labor, approximately every 1-2 years depending on your environment and resources.

With regards to LED instead, lens cleaning and associated labor,  approximately every 1-2 years depending on your environment and resources.

Electrical Supply & Operating Costs

What is your current supply capacity? Do you have a limited supply that you will need to work within? Will you need to factor in the cost of adding a transformer to expand your supply? These are all things you should consider when deciding what type of lighting you should use for your crop. 

First, you should figure out what the cost per kW is.  You can easily do the math:

# lighting hours annually x actual wattage of the fixtures x # of fixtures) /1000 x $/kW. 

Here are two examples showing the difference between HPS and LED:

Example 1. DE HPS - (4000 hours x 1045W x 100 Fixtures)/1000 x $0.12 = $50,160.00 annual electrical operating cost for 100 x 1000W DE HPS

Example 2. LED (4000 hours x 640W x 100 Fixtures) /1000 x $0.12 = $30,720.00 annual electrical operating cost for 100 x 640W LED

This means a potential 38.8% kW savings

Measuring fixture efficacy is important to determine the efficiency of the light source at converting watts into photons (PPE). The higher the PPE, the better the luminaire is. It is measured in micromoles per Joule (µmol/J) and is calculated by dividing the µmol/s1 by the wattage. Let’s look at two examples:

Example 1. DE HPS 2150µmol/s1 divided by 1045W = 2.06µmol/J

Example 2. LED 2200µmol/s divided by 672W = 3.3µmol/J

As we can see, the LED luminaire has a higher efficiency and is, therefore, better at converting photons into PAR energy.

Check out our Light Energy Calculator to find out more to compare efficiencies across different lighting technologies. 

HVAC Requirements
HVAC requirements will vary based on many factors and should be assessed to determine what lighting will fit into your application. 

Geographic location: year-round temperatures can influence your HVAC needs.

Indoor vs. Greenhouse applications will have varying HVAC requirements.

Indoor facility: The cost to cool your grow can be one of your highest production costs, and your AC load is based on the amount of BTUs produced from your luminaires. This is simple math as 1 watt equals 3.412 BTUs. No matter what 1000W HPS fixture you use, the BTUs from that fixture will be 3412.

Calculate the BTU/h to size your AC = # fixtures x actual wattage x 3.41:

Example 1. DE HPS 100 Fixtures x 1045W x 3.41 = 356,345 BTU/h

Example 2. LED 100 Fixtures x 640W x 3.41 = 218,240 BTU/h = Potential 38.8% BTU/h savings

Example 3. Hybrid 1:1 50 x 1045W DE HPS+50 x 640W LED x 3.41 = 287,292.5 BTU/h

Greenhouse facility: DE HPS can reduce additional greenhouse heating by 40% in colder winter climates vs. LED.

Growing Practices
Growing vertically or in a traditional single-tiered facility can help you determine if you should use HID or LED luminaires.  Let’s look at the differences between them both. 

Vertical racking – Maximize your vertical footprint by minimizing the distance between shelves with fixtures closer to the crop.

o   Vertical racking can increase your canopy by 100% per additional tier in the same linear footprint, with yield increasing slightly less by approx. 80% per tier due to smaller plants/less yield—but then possibly more frequent turns.

o   LEDs are best suited to close-to-canopy mounting due to their lowered heat load.

o   Detailed ROI is needed to include HVAC adjustments to manage vertical microclimates on each tier.

Single-layer – Mounting height restrictions and available distance from the canopy should be considered. HPS luminaires require at least 3 feet from the canopy.


LED: Tolerance & resources for the learning curve of how plants react under different spectrums to reach optimum levels. Rebalancing inputs: temperature, CO2, irrigation, fertigation, and possibly humidity. Opportunity to affect morphology & metabolic processes.

DE HPS: tried & trusted spectrum for experienced grower, confidence in growth & yield results. There is no spectral variety or opportunity to further affect morphology or metabolic processes unless mixing different HID spectrums, i.e., adding some blue to flower cycle with CMH or MH.

Pros and cons
In the following charts, we overview the pros and cons of each type of lighting—including a hybrid LED-HPS system, to help determine what type of lighting system will work best for your application.

*Example calculations & savings are based on 640W LED & 1045W DE HPS, hybrid solution is based on 1:1 DE HPS + LED, associated costs based on $300 DE HPS fixture & $900 LED

Bottom Line
With all these factors above, how do we answer our initial question? Quite frankly, there is no simple answer. Every cultivation is different – from different strains being grown, varying growing climates by geography, multiple styles of growers, indoor versus greenhouse, etc. All these factors will weigh heavily on what is better for you.

Remember to analyze and prioritize your key deciding factors and to do your homework on the best product to meet your needs and budget. Lighting is a long-term investment, so partner with a quality manufacturer that will understand your needs, provide a detailed and professional light plan as well as after-sales support.

For more information:
P.L. Light Systems
[email protected]

Publication date: